Some
of the circumstances for when a court would question the consideration being
offered.
Consideration is legal value promised to another party when
making a contract. It can take the form of either a tangible payment or the
performance of act such as money, physical objects, services, promised actions,
abstinence from a future action, and much more. If X signs a contract to buy a
motorcycle from Y for $100,000, X's consideration is the $100,000, and Y's
consideration is the motorcycle. Consideration consist of two elements:
something of legal value must be given and there must be a bargained for
exchange. If there is no element of consideration found, there is thus no
contract formed.
Generally,
courts do not inquire whether the deal between two parties was monetarily fair
or not and do not question the adequacy of consideration in a contract, but
that even a bargained for exchange of a peppercorn may form the basis of a
valid contract. Some exceptions for when a court may question the
considered offered are:
Illegal
consideration: if the other party in contract used an
illegal act to make payment in contract then these consideration are void by
court. The illegal act doesn’t support the contract and promises shouldn’t be
influence by the illegal activities. For example if someone is threatened to
kill or had mental torcher in order to make payment then it can be treat as
illegal consideration in that case court can question to considered.
Illusory
promises: if the two parties have contract and done
agreement on their responsibility, if at some time period one or both party
chose not to perform their contractual obligation, then contract lacks
consideration. It’s like false promises, first agree on duty and obligation in
contract then avoid it on future.
Moral
obligation: moral obligation is not treated as the
legal consideration because it is based on promises made out of a sense of
moral obligation and they lack consideration. The promises are done through
affection and love. Gift promises and moral obligation are not considered
supported by valid consideration. There is no any written document and it
totally based on what parties thinks for each other.
Preexisting
duty: A promises lacks consideration if a person promise
to perform any duty that already they are obligate to do. The task that is
responsibility of person to do and again if contract placed to do same task,
then promises is unenforceable because no new consideration has been given. If
the term of contract are change during the course of its performance such
changes are unenforceable. For example Sam is today 10 years old. Sam dad
promises Sam to give $5,000 if he will not smoke until his 18th
birthday. After 8 years in his 18th birthday he asked $5,000 money
but dad didn’t pay it. Because according to the law no one are allow to smoke
until their 18th birthday. Here Sam preexisting duty is not to smoke
until he will 18 years old and in this case the promises lacks consideration
and dad will win.
Past
consideration: A promise based on a party’s past
performance lacks consideration. If there is no new consideration is placed in
the contract then this types of contract are unenforceable. Such that contract
are enforceable if only if some new consideration is given to support the
contract. For example if contractor promise to give bonus to their worker
because they done great work last year and after some time if contractor refuse
to give bonus, the worker cannot recovery the bonus because there is no any
consideration. The contractor uses past consideration and these type of
contract are unenforceable.
References
Cheeseman, H. R. (2006). Agreement
and Consideration. In Contemporary Business and Online Commerce Law (pp
194-198). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey : Person Education Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment